-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2017-15592 / XSA-243 version 5 x86: Incorrect handling of self-linear shadow mappings with translated guests UPDATES IN VERSION 5 ==================== New final patch, addressing a hypervisor crash the original fix caused, which by itself represents another security issue (DoS). ISSUE DESCRIPTION ================= The shadow pagetable code uses linear mappings to inspect and modify the shadow pagetables. A linear mapping which points back to itself is known as self-linear. For translated guests, the shadow linear mappings (being in a separate address space) are not intended to be self-linear. For non-translated guests, the shadow linear mappings (being the same address space) are intended to be self-linear. When constructing a monitor pagetable for Xen to run on a vcpu with, the shadow linear slot is filled with a self-linear mapping, and for translated guests, shortly thereafter replaced with a non-self-linear mapping, when the guest's %cr3 is shadowed. However when writeable heuristics are used, the shadow mappings are used as part of shadowing %cr3, causing the heuristics to be applied to Xen's pagetables, not the guest shadow pagetables. While investigating, it was also identified that PV auto-translate mode was insecure. This mode was removed in Xen 4.7 due to being unused, unmaintained and presumed broken. We are not aware of any guest implementation of PV auto-translate mode. IMPACT ====== A malicious or buggy HVM guest may cause a hypervisor crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) affecting the entire host, or cause hypervisor memory corruption. We cannot rule out a guest being able to escalate its privilege. VULNERABLE SYSTEMS ================== All versions of Xen are vulnerable. HVM guests using shadow mode paging can exploit this vulnerability. HVM guests using Hardware Assisted Paging (HAP) as well as PV guests cannot exploit this vulnerability. ARM systems are not vulnerable. MITIGATION ========== Running only PV guests will avoid this vulnerability. Where the HVM guest is explicitly configured to use shadow paging (eg via the `hap=0' xl domain configuration file parameter), changing to HAP (eg by setting `hap=1') will avoid exposing the vulnerability to those guests. HAP is the default (in upstream Xen), where the hardware supports it; so this mitigation is only applicable if HAP has been disabled by configuration. CREDITS ======= This issue was discovered by Andrew Cooper of Citrix. RESOLUTION ========== Applying the appropriate attached set of patches resolves this issue. xsa243-[12].patch xen-unstable, Xen 4.9.x xsa243-{4.8-1,2}.patch Xen 4.8.x xsa243-{4.7-1,2}.patch Xen 4.7.x xsa243-{4.6-[12],2}.patch Xen 4.6.x xsa243-4.{6-1,5-[23]}.patch Xen 4.5.x $ sha256sum xsa243* a5b484db80346f7e75c7921ee4780567f04b9f9b4620c0cde4bfa1df3ac0f87f xsa243-1.patch 013cff90312305b7f4ce6818a25760bcfca61bfadd860b694afa04d56e60c563 xsa243-2.patch 79e1c5e088eee8e78aa67895a29d611352c64251854e4c5129e33c85988a47a5 xsa243-4.5-2.patch b838f387747c6e45314f44202c018ad907a8119bb7d8330fc875dc4243626e78 xsa243-4.5-3.patch 722073aad1e734e24b0b79d03a1957e491f3616fe6e244a89050f7a50f8f356b xsa243-4.6-1.patch 94cb346c486f88f2f4f701564017e1997e518a5a14218f0e38ff882c60fb382c xsa243-4.6-2.patch 465ba9e3293591a3c84c122ffd73474fe96483f5e21565440d5fbc207fa4c4a9 xsa243-4.7-1.patch f8e471b42502905a442d43934ac339663a6124118c9762b31f2ad930fd532e64 xsa243-4.8-1.patch $ DEPLOYMENT DURING EMBARGO ========================= Deployment of the patches and/or mitigations described above (or others which are substantially similar) is permitted during the embargo, even on public-facing systems with untrusted guest users and administrators. But: Distribution of updated software is prohibited (except to other members of the predisclosure list). Predisclosure list members who wish to deploy significantly different patches and/or mitigations, please contact the Xen Project Security Team. (Note: this during-embargo deployment notice is retained in post-embargo publicly released Xen Project advisories, even though it is then no longer applicable. This is to enable the community to have oversight of the Xen Project Security Team's decisionmaking.) For more information about permissible uses of embargoed information, consult the Xen Project community's agreed Security Policy: http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJaDHWmAAoJEIP+FMlX6CvZbKgH/RsntzKBpEJQfElzpN15+eMM Kakfq3Mzad4JuaOb5dVy4fhE88gHgE344mmiUqu/h+pwRKofC/a3DvS4GPO8NJAI Zdu1CCkuZ3/L3IpbtdGsLMw1EZGQLXNsQGWCgDB3sNAT6Ue+FvmJbiP0RkIO+qXw 7KSCfs2NtMvkj17jt5ZYj2Y43d0IvWirR3LHkJIDR0ZPYkX5WagAmuOom3bj57lt 0Q/GC40x+kO9lQSw299CZxuHTi34zu0V4/HRtfSSVph5Gbcb+4kxMqv8e3wRfgg9 kBF6FD12oLJkArIeb/J72m13RTiIJDiG3VltS9B2Vmm9+LZOhBvbsfILrePk0qE= =6RHQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----