debuggers.hg
changeset 22903:74cd0f668546
The current libxl_set_memory_target function subtracts a negative amount
from an uint32_t variable without checking if the operation wraps
around.
This patch fixes this bug (that I previously believed to be an
hypervisor issue):
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1729
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
from an uint32_t variable without checking if the operation wraps
around.
This patch fixes this bug (that I previously believed to be an
hypervisor issue):
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1729
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
author | Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue Feb 01 19:25:08 2011 +0000 (2011-02-01) |
parents | 18807b89083d |
children | 9a6458e0c3f5 |
files | tools/libxl/libxl.c |
line diff
1.1 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c Tue Feb 01 19:23:31 2011 +0000 1.2 +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c Tue Feb 01 19:25:08 2011 +0000 1.3 @@ -2059,9 +2059,12 @@ retry_transaction: 1.4 goto out; 1.5 } 1.6 1.7 - if (relative) 1.8 - new_target_memkb = current_target_memkb + target_memkb; 1.9 - else 1.10 + if (relative) { 1.11 + if (target_memkb < 0 && abs(target_memkb) > current_target_memkb) 1.12 + new_target_memkb = 0; 1.13 + else 1.14 + new_target_memkb = current_target_memkb + target_memkb; 1.15 + } else 1.16 new_target_memkb = target_memkb; 1.17 if (new_target_memkb > memorykb) { 1.18 LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_ERROR,