From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: sysctl/Flask: add preliminary check for XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist

To shield the sysctl lock from abuse by unauthorized domains, follow what
5154fdda1124 ("domctl: protect locking for get_domain_state") did: Check
for permission to issue the operation against DOM_XEN in flask_sysctl().
The finer-grained xsm_getdomaininfo() later in the handling of the sub-op
remains unaltered.

In the in-tree policy respective permission therefore needs granting.

This is part of CVE-2026-62426 / XSA-499.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>

--- a/tools/flask/policy/modules/xen.if
+++ b/tools/flask/policy/modules/xen.if
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ define(`create_domain_build_label', `
 # manage_domain(priv, target)
 #   Allow managing a running domain
 define(`manage_domain', `
+	allow $1 domxen_t:domain getdomaininfo;
 	allow $1 $2:domain {
 		getdomaininfo
 		getvcpuinfo
--- a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
@@ -878,7 +878,6 @@ static int cf_check flask_sysctl(const s
     {
     /* These have individual XSM hooks */
     case XEN_SYSCTL_readconsole:
-    case XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist:
     case XEN_SYSCTL_page_offline_op:
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
     case XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_hotplug:
@@ -925,6 +924,9 @@ static int cf_check flask_sysctl(const s
     case XEN_SYSCTL_get_cpu_policy:
         return domain_has_xen(current->domain, XEN__PHYSINFO);
 
+    case XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist:
+        return flask_getdomaininfo(dom_xen);
+
     case XEN_SYSCTL_psr_cmt_op:
         return avc_current_has_perm(SECINITSID_XEN, SECCLASS_XEN2,
                                     XEN2__PSR_CMT_OP, NULL);